You might be rejecting the perfect candidate before they even click "Apply." Language is subtle, powerful, and often unintentionally exclusionary.

If you are writing a standard job post for a "Software Engineer" but use words like "Ninja," "Rockstar," or "Dominate," research shows you are statistically reducing the number of female applicants by up to 40%. This isn't just a matter of political correctness; it is a matter of business math. By shrinking your funnel at the top, you increase your Cost of a Bad Hire and extend your time-to-fill.

Unconscious bias in job descriptions (JDs) is one of the biggest bottlenecks in modern recruitment. It extends beyond gender to include ageism ("Digital Native"), ableism ("Must lift 20lbs"), and educational elitism.

The good news? Artificial Intelligence is the perfect unbiased editor. Unlike a human hiring manager, who carries a lifetime of subconscious preferences, AI can be trained to spot exclusionary patterns instantly. In this guide, we will show you how to use tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Textio to neutralize your language and widen your talent pool immediately.

The Hidden Cost of "Bro-Culture" Copy

Why does this matter? Is this just HR fluff? No, it is about ROI (Return on Investment).

When your job description contains biased language, you are artificially shrinking your talent pool. If you use "masculine-coded" language, qualified female candidates often opt out, assuming the culture won't be a good fit. If you use ageist language, experienced veterans with 20 years of institutional knowledge won't apply.

The Data: A seminal study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that masculine-coded words (e.g., competitive, dominant, leader) deter women from applying to jobs, even if they are 100% qualified. Conversely, feminine-coded words (e.g., support, understand, interpersonal) do not deter men. This creates a market inefficiency that you can exploit: neutralize your ads, and you get access to the talent your competitors are scaring away.

-- AdSense In-Article --

Decoding the 3 Types of Bias

Before we use AI to fix it, we need to understand what we are looking for. Most biased JDs fall into three major traps:

1. Gender Bias (The "Rockstar" Problem)

This is the most common and widely researched form of bias. It involves using sports metaphors, war terminology, or aggressive adjectives that signal a hyper-competitive, aggressive workplace.

❌ Biased

"We need a killer sales rep to hunt down leads and crush the competition. Must be a Rockstar."

✅ Inclusive

"We need a proficient sales rep to identify new leads and drive market growth. Must be dedicated."

2. Ageism (The "Digital Native" Trap)

This is rampant in the tech and marketing sectors. Terms that imply you are looking for someone young are not only exclusionary but often illegal in the US and UK under employment discrimination laws.

❌ Biased

"Looking for a Digital Native to join our young, energetic team. Must have 5 years experience (max)."

✅ Inclusive

"Looking for a Tech-Savvy individual to join our fast-paced team. We value current skills over tenure."

3. Ableism (The "Must Lift 50lbs" Default)

This often appears in the "Requirements" section due to copy-pasting old templates. Do you really need your Accountant to "lift 50 lbs"? Probably not. Including physical requirements for desk jobs discriminates against people with disabilities.

Similarly, vague requirements like "Must have strong communication skills" can sometimes bias against neurodivergent candidates (like those with Autism) who might be incredible coders but communicate differently. Be specific: "Must be able to document code clearly" is a better requirement.

Step-by-Step: Using ChatGPT to Audit Your JDs

You don't need expensive enterprise software to start fixing this today. If you have ChatGPT (Free or Plus), Claude, or Gemini, you can use these specific prompts to audit your current listings.

Prompt 1: The "DEI Audit"

Use this prompt to identify the problems. Do not ask it to rewrite yet; ask it to explain the bias first so you can learn.

Role: Act as an expert Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Officer.

Task: Review the job description below. Analyze it for unconscious gender bias, ageism, ableism, and exclusionary corporate jargon.

Output: Create a bulleted list of "Red Flag Words" found in the text. For each word, explain why it might be exclusionary and provide a neutral alternative.

Job Description: [PASTE TEXT HERE]

Prompt 2: The "Skills-First" Rewrite

Often, we ask for degrees or years of experience that aren't actually necessary. This is called "Credentialism," and it filters out talented self-taught developers or people from non-traditional backgrounds.

Task: Rewrite the "Requirements" section of this job description to focus on Outcomes and Skills rather than specific university degrees or arbitrary years of experience.

Context: Instead of saying "Degree in Computer Science," focus on "Demonstrated ability to write clean Python code."

Goal: To encourage candidates from non-traditional educational backgrounds to apply.

Prompt 3: The Readability Fix

If your job description is a wall of text with complex sentences, you discourage people who speak English as a second language (ESL) or neurodivergent candidates.

Task: Simplify the language of this job description. Aim for a Grade 8 reading level. Use shorter sentences, active voice, and bullet points. Remove any internal corporate slang that an outsider wouldn't understand.

The "Confidence Gap": Why Must-Haves Matter

There is a famous statistic from an internal Hewlett-Packard report: Men apply for a job when they meet only 60% of the qualifications, but women apply only if they meet 100% of them.

To combat this "Confidence Gap," you must rigorously edit your bullet points.

  • Separate Essentials: Clearly distinguish between "Required Skills" and "Nice-to-Have Skills."
  • Limit Requirements: Try to keep the mandatory list to 5-7 bullet points maximum. If you list 20 requirements, you are unintentionally filtering out women and honest candidates who don't want to lie.
  • Add a Disclaimer: We recommend adding this sentence to the bottom of every JD: "Studies show that women and underrepresented groups are less likely to apply if they don't meet 100% of the criteria. If you think you have what it takes, we encourage you to apply."
-- AdSense In-Article --

Top Dedicated Tools (Beyond ChatGPT)

While ChatGPT is a great generalist tool, specialized software offers deeper analytics and integration with your Applicant Tracking System (ATS).

1. Textio
The industry leader. Textio uses a massive dataset of hiring outcomes to predict how your language will perform. It gives your JD a score (0-100) and highlights phrases that will speed up or slow down hiring. It is expensive, but for enterprise teams, it is the gold standard.

2. Gender Decoder (Free)
A simple, web-based tool created by Kat Matfield. You paste your text, and it highlights masculine vs. feminine coded words based on the academic paper mentioned earlier. It doesn't offer rewrites, but it's a great quick check.

3. Datapeople
Datapeople focuses on the entire funnel. It tells you if your "Requirements" list is too long (which deters women) or if your title is confusing. It helps standardize job titles across large organizations to ensure pay equity.

Best Practices: Don't Let AI Remove the "Soul"

There is a risk when using AI: you might sanitize your job description so much that it becomes boring. A job ad is still an ad. You need to sell the role.

The Balance:

  • Do remove exclusionary language (Ninja, Rockstar, Digital Native).
  • Do keep your company's unique voice. If you are a fun, casual startup, you can still sound fun without being biased.
  • Don't lie about the culture. If your company is highly competitive and aggressive, using neutral language might attract candidates who will hate working there. Be honest, but professional.

Legal Considerations in 2025

As AI becomes more integrated into hiring, governments are catching up. New York City’s Local Law 144 now requires bias audits for automated employment decision tools. While this mostly applies to AI Resume Screening Tools, the principle is spreading to all parts of the hiring funnel.

Using AI to write descriptions is generally safe, but using AI to filter candidates based on those descriptions is where liability starts. Always ensure a human is the final decision maker. Read more in our guide to AI Recruitment Laws.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does unbiased language actually work?

Yes. Companies like Atlassian report a drastic increase in female technical hires after overhauling their JDs to be gender-neutral. It is one of the highest-ROI activities you can do in HR.

What if I actually need a "strong" leader?

You can ask for leadership without using gender-coded aggression. Instead of "Dominant leader who takes charge," try "Decisive leader who guides the team toward objectives." The meaning is the same, but the gender coding is removed.

Is this just for tech jobs?

No. While the "Bro-grammer" culture in tech is famous for this, bias exists in sales, finance, and even nursing (which often suffers from the opposite problem: being too feminine-coded, deterring male applicants).

Conclusion: Your 5-Minute Action Plan

Improving diversity in your company doesn't start with a massive corporate initiative. It starts with the very first touchpoint: the job description.

Here is what you can do right now:
1. Copy your most recent JD into the Gender Decoder.
2. If it leans "Masculine," paste it into ChatGPT with Prompt 1.
3. Add the "Confidence Gap" disclaimer to the footer.
4. Republish and watch your applicant quality improve.